Neutrality for the sake of neutrality doesn't really serve us in the age of Trump.
Google my name and 'Barack Obama.' There were many days I was tough on him. People have short-term memories. They think we're only being tough on Trump. That's just not true.
The president is supposed to stand up for the First Amendment and stand up for the free press - not put us through the meat grinder.
Well I think we can't avoid covering the news and when the president says something like that you're the enemy of the people, I think I'm well within my right to stand up and say this is well within my lane as a journalist and as an American to say that that's not appropriate.
We can't have Trump supporters only trust what comes out of conservative news media and vice versa.
We go through periods of turmoil in our nation's history, and one of the remarkable things about the United States is that we seem to keep making our way through those periods.
We should not have the president of the United States referring to segments of American society as the enemy of the people.
We have seen presidents from both parties express their frustrations with the press. That's absolutely normal.
I think aggressive, sometimes outspoken reporting from the White House briefing room is expected by the American people.
Yes, Barack Obama had his clashes with the press. I witnessed those first-hand covering the second term of his administration. But we did not have Barack Obama on almost a weekly basis referring to the press as the enemy of the people and accusing reporters of treason and calling legitimate stories fake news.
I have never witnessed a concerted effort by any news organization to take a stand one way or the other on a political issue, to damage one particular party or help another.