I like the idea of stepping back into another time period.
Andy was a character, and the two of us did have some things in common. We appreciated funny things, didn't like serious things.
It's good to aggravate people a little. It makes them pay attention.
Andy was not a hippie or rebel but more like a mischievous child. He was never out to destroy everything. He became a New Yorker, and New Yorkers know, like the media, what's going on around them is a fashion thing that will change to something else.
What made Andy famous was the years I managed him. I created the Velvet Underground and told him not to worry about them because they would help his career. All those things I did created his fame.
People treat serious subjects so seriously, which is so obvious a way of dealing with them. I'm always thinking that the best way of dealing with them is to show people as human beings.
I've always stayed independent, but I've always felt an obligation to make movies an untutored audience could like.
I'm not against censorship in principle. Not at all. Some things should be censored.
It's a debilitating process, working with the studios. With the length of time it takes for drafts and development deals, your enthusiasm is gone before you're ready to make the film.
Somewhere in the '60s, actors became wimps and basket-case psychotics.