As a political independent, I would gladly vote for any political party dedicated to limited government and entrepreneurship.
We expect to foster a conservative governing philosophy consisting of limited government and respect for traditional American virtues.
The mission statement of the RSC is to foster a constitutionally bound limited government, it's to have a strong national defense, it's to protect private property rights and it's to support American values. That's what the mission statement is. There's nothing in the mission statement about trying to hold leadership accountable.
Conservatives shouldn't count on the Supreme Court to do our work for us on Obamacare. The Court may rule as it should, and strike down the mandate. But it may not. And even if it does, the future of health care in America - and for that matter, the future of limited government - depends ultimately on the verdict of the American people.
People in Eastern Washington should be confident in knowing that the government will not come and seize their property or farm land. Legislation is needed to correct this decision and restore the principle of having limited government involvement.
I'm still a conservative, you know, someone who believes in limited government and balanced budgets and the Constitution.
The left loves the courts. They hate constitutional limited government.
The most misreported and misunderstood thing about the tea party is its political leanings. The tea party has no political leaning. It stands straight for limited government, low taxes, and liberty for all.
Classical liberalism is the idea that individual freedom and limited government are the best way for humans to form a free society.
I believe in limited government. I know what the welfare state has done to the black community.
