Unlike in the United States, where freedom of expression is a fundamental right that supersedes other interests, Europe views an individual’s privacy and freedom of expression as almost equal rights.
Once the butt of jokes for being the site where visitors could find anything, true or not, Wikipedia in recent years has become a more trusted source of information — certainly for settling bar bets, but even for weighty topics like Ebola.
Through Google, you can find the horrible things people say about you, and the nice things they say about you. And so I do that regularly to sort of check on it.
America's got a much stronger tradition of free speech and freedom of the press. In Europe, it's much more nuanced and they put a lot of meaning on the rights of your reputation.
Before Wikileaks, or even the Internet, there were just plain leaks.
Playing the government off newspapers, and newspapers against each other, still does not compare with the power of the World Wide Web.
As time has shifted, The Times and all the other media outlets recognize how important Wikipedia is. It's not the same hurdle anymore. I don't have to sort of say: 'Wow look at this strange thing going on, can I write some weird story about it?' Instead it's like: 'This is hugely important, and of course, write, we want to know every change.
Never before has the boundary between geek culture and mainstream culture been so porous.
An engineering degree is also no longer a requisite to using technology, as seemingly anyone today can install a printer or upload a video. Similarly, another signifier of nerd status — knowing obscure facts about favorite subjects — has also lost its currency.
Internet companies and nonprofits like Wikipedia have been forced to choose between cooperating with the Chinese government and losing access to the growing online audience there.
Governments are trying to wrestle, how do you censor without being so heavy-handed that you make people really, you know, can't live their lives.
From gadgets to social networks to video games, the decision not to embrace the newest technology is a choice to be out of the mainstream.
If someone today had the Pentagon Papers, or the modern equivalent, would he still go to the press, as Daniel Ellsberg did nearly 40 years ago, and wait for the documents to be analyzed and published? Or would that person simply post them online immediately?
