The White House has a choice: They can change course, or they can double down on a vision of government that the American people have roundly rejected.
You know, 'Professor Obama' has been a label applied to him by Republicans and Democrats alike. He's a very smart guy. But I think he'd be, you know, better served not to spend so much time trying to impress us with his particular position on an issue and understand that there are things upon which we simply have a disagreement.
Mitt Romney has never been resigned to what someone else said was possible. He cut his own path. That's why he believes in his heart that America has a future full of opportunity and hope. And that's why when Mitt Romney looks down the road, he sees a country that's ready for a comeback.
I don't think it's all that unusual for a new president to want to get along with the Russians. I remember George W. Bush having the same hope.
After 1994, the public had the impression we Republicans overpromised and underdelivered.
Today, Democrats not only have the White House; they have the Senate too. So we have to be realistic about what we can and cannot achieve, while at the same recognizing that realism should never be confused with capitulation.
What I have said is, when the American people elect divided government, what are they saying? I think they're saying we know you have differences of opinion on big things.
President Obama had two Supreme Court nominees in his first term. There was no filibuster against them.
If the administration wants cooperation, it will have to begin to move in our direction.
I don't in any way think the American people rejected the Republican Party, or we'd be in a lot worse shape than we are.
There is a lot of room for improvement in Social Security. We owe our children the most financially sound system possible. They will have paid into it their entire working lives. They deserve to be protected by it. for our children and grandchildren.
Syria and Iran have always had a pretty tight relationship, and it looks to me like they just cooked up a press release to put out to sort of restate the obvious. They're both problem countries; we know that. And this doesn't change anything.
The president feels not only do we need to change these rogue regimes, but even our friendly allies, who really basically have, sort of, benign dictatorships, need to get with the program if they want to have long-term security and prosperity from terrorism.
Bolton's exactly what the U.N. needs at this point. The president's right on the mark in picking him.